While this can make it easier to understand any given Maven build, as long as you don’t have any special requirements, it also makes it unsuitable for many automation problems. However, Maven provides a very rigid model that makes customization tedious and sometimes impossible. For example, Gradle is designed with embedding in mind using its Tooling API.īoth Gradle and Maven provide convention over configuration. Gradle's model also allows it to be used for native development with C/C++ and can be expanded to cover any ecosystem. Google chose Gradle as the official build tool for Android not because build scripts are code, but because Gradle is modeled in a way that is extensible in the most fundamental ways. This GIF shows a side-by-side clean build of the Apache Commons Lang library using Maven and Gradle (without build cache). It is not meant to be exhaustive, but you can check the Gradle feature list and Gradle vs Maven performance comparison to learn more. The following is a summary of the major differences between Gradle and Apache Maven: flexibility, performance, user experience, and dependency management.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |